Comments on: It depends on what the definition of “is” is

By: Joe Medley

Joe Medley — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:10:30 +0000

Christian churches are always afraid of new things. Given such a track record I don’t know why they think I should listen to them.

By: prm

prm — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 02:38:39 +0000

I’m for the amendment, but I think it’s likely to be defeated overwhelmingly at the polls. It will be difficult to convince the average Missourian there’s a difference between “therapeutic” and “reproductive” cloning in a 30 to 60-second TV or radio ad. And the opposition will take … um … “creative liberties” that will make an emotional rather than rational appeal. It’s toast.

By: Derek

Derek — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:44:18 +0000

While I am against this amendment, I’m not going to block the petition drive. The best weapon against the amendment is education and clarification. My problem with the proposed amendment is the wording and would believe that many people may be confused if they were to read the proposal.