<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats win big in Blunt&#8217;s backyard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/02/democrats-win-big-in-blunts-backyard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/02/democrats-win-big-in-blunts-backyard/</link>
	<description>A Weblog for Kansas City, Missouri.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SummitGuy</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/02/democrats-win-big-in-blunts-backyard/comment-page-1/#comment-39597</link>
		<dc:creator>SummitGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/02/democrats-win-big-in-blunts-backyard/#comment-39597</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s really funny, Kelly.  Few Missouri Democrats are anywhere near the left.  Most would actually Republicans if they were in a bigger state.  That&#039;s why the Democratic party controlled the state for so many years, they were more like liberal Republicans than actual Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really funny, Kelly.  Few Missouri Democrats are anywhere near the left.  Most would actually Republicans if they were in a bigger state.  That&#8217;s why the Democratic party controlled the state for so many years, they were more like liberal Republicans than actual Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogKC</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/02/democrats-win-big-in-blunts-backyard/comment-page-1/#comment-39594</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/02/democrats-win-big-in-blunts-backyard/#comment-39594</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Cole</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/02/democrats-win-big-in-blunts-backyard/comment-page-1/#comment-39518</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/02/democrats-win-big-in-blunts-backyard/#comment-39518</guid>
		<description>Obviously, our reporting on this matter is not fact checked.  The House District that is in question is 132nd (not the 123rd) district.  I can assure you party affiliation in the Southern Part of MO is irrelevant.  Due to the idealogy of the each of these candidates is tradionally more aligned on the conservative side. It is very difficult to get elected in SWMO as a Democrat if you are too far to the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, our reporting on this matter is not fact checked.  The House District that is in question is 132nd (not the 123rd) district.  I can assure you party affiliation in the Southern Part of MO is irrelevant.  Due to the idealogy of the each of these candidates is tradionally more aligned on the conservative side. It is very difficult to get elected in SWMO as a Democrat if you are too far to the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

