<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate tonight?  What debate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/</link>
	<description>A Weblog for Kansas City, Missouri.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: logtar</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-72053</link>
		<dc:creator>logtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/#comment-72053</guid>
		<description>This should be very interesting to watch... I wonder if they would go all out... Cheat... liar... cheat... liar. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be very interesting to watch&#8230; I wonder if they would go all out&#8230; Cheat&#8230; liar&#8230; cheat&#8230; liar. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogKC</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71848</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/#comment-71848</guid>
		<description>William Buckley returns as lemming, and as crazy as ever.  buy-bye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Buckley returns as lemming, and as crazy as ever.  buy-bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisM70</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71845</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisM70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/#comment-71845</guid>
		<description>From Wikipedia:

&quot;Lemmings are small rodents...the term &quot;lemming&quot; is often used in slang to denote those who mindlessly follow the crowd, even if destruction is the result.

Sounds accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Wikipedia:</p>
<p>&#8220;Lemmings are small rodents&#8230;the term &#8220;lemming&#8221; is often used in slang to denote those who mindlessly follow the crowd, even if destruction is the result.</p>
<p>Sounds accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisM70</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71839</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisM70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/#comment-71839</guid>
		<description>Lemming, you surely ARE a lemming.
You can&#039;t criticize someone for bad grammar if you can&#039;t SPELL grammar.  

The issue here is that ABC/KMBC feels that dancing D-list celebrities are more important that the politicians that make decisions that effect our lives.

Why not tape-delay the dancing show?  Because it is all about ratings, that&#039;s why. We all need to take a good look at where our priorities lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lemming, you surely ARE a lemming.<br />
You can&#8217;t criticize someone for bad grammar if you can&#8217;t SPELL grammar.  </p>
<p>The issue here is that ABC/KMBC feels that dancing D-list celebrities are more important that the politicians that make decisions that effect our lives.</p>
<p>Why not tape-delay the dancing show?  Because it is all about ratings, that&#8217;s why. We all need to take a good look at where our priorities lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisM70</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71820</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisM70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/#comment-71820</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the real issue is why isn&#039;t anyone ELSE trying to televise these debates?  We have a lot of TV channels...Couldn&#039;t Time Warner or other cable companies just air the debate on public access?  How about &quot;The Spot&quot;?  

Doesn&#039;t the media have some responsibility beyond ratings?  How about what is best for the public?
I truly believe that if the media starting treating debates, politics, international news, etc.  as important, people would start to believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the real issue is why isn&#8217;t anyone ELSE trying to televise these debates?  We have a lot of TV channels&#8230;Couldn&#8217;t Time Warner or other cable companies just air the debate on public access?  How about &#8220;The Spot&#8221;?  </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t the media have some responsibility beyond ratings?  How about what is best for the public?<br />
I truly believe that if the media starting treating debates, politics, international news, etc.  as important, people would start to believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justcara</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71789</link>
		<dc:creator>Justcara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/#comment-71789</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the real difference between a St. Louis or Springfield debate vs. a Kansas City debate?  Oh, just 765,000+ KANSAS residents of the Metro who have no vote in the Talent/McCaskill race.  

Also, the two &quot;Dancing with the Stars&quot; episodes from last week were ranked #3 and #5 nationwide according to the Neilsen ratings.  It would be a poor business decision for an affiliate to pre-empt a top 5 show for a debate (without commercial interruption) that probably only 25% of their regular Wed. night viewers would watch.

Let&#039;s be realistic.  It&#039;s not like KMBC is showing the debate AFTER the election - they are just delaying it a day.  Big deal. This is a tempest in a teapot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the real difference between a St. Louis or Springfield debate vs. a Kansas City debate?  Oh, just 765,000+ KANSAS residents of the Metro who have no vote in the Talent/McCaskill race.  </p>
<p>Also, the two &#8220;Dancing with the Stars&#8221; episodes from last week were ranked #3 and #5 nationwide according to the Neilsen ratings.  It would be a poor business decision for an affiliate to pre-empt a top 5 show for a debate (without commercial interruption) that probably only 25% of their regular Wed. night viewers would watch.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be realistic.  It&#8217;s not like KMBC is showing the debate AFTER the election &#8211; they are just delaying it a day.  Big deal. This is a tempest in a teapot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisM70</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71780</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisM70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/#comment-71780</guid>
		<description>P.S.  KMBC tells me that they are NOT prohibiting the other stations from running the debate live. 

Here&#039;s the quote:
&quot;We did not forbid them from showing it.
When working with the campaigns, this was the only date they agreed on for Kansas City.   It was not one we proposed because of scheduling conflicts.
So that is what we had to live with.&quot;

So who&#039;s telling the truth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  KMBC tells me that they are NOT prohibiting the other stations from running the debate live. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the quote:<br />
&#8220;We did not forbid them from showing it.<br />
When working with the campaigns, this was the only date they agreed on for Kansas City.   It was not one we proposed because of scheduling conflicts.<br />
So that is what we had to live with.&#8221;</p>
<p>So who&#8217;s telling the truth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisM70</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71777</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisM70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/#comment-71777</guid>
		<description>I think this is a very disturbing story.
Of course we all know who is to blame...

Us.

We ignore politics, we vote for who we think looks the best instead of who is best qualified, and we can&#039;t stop being infatuated by media-generated celebrities.  I have no idea who Sara Evans is, but that didn&#039;t stop the media from spending the last 3 days talking about her!

WE the people need to demand more not just from the news media and our politicians, but from OURSELVES.  We all need to find the time to understand the issues, and then get off our lazy butts and VOTE.  If not, we end up where we are now - in a terribly bloody, expensive war run by a President that was/is never questioned by the Congress.

The next episode of &quot;Survivor&quot; or &quot;Gray&#039;s Anatomy&quot; isn&#039;t going to change your life - however, the election of Jim Talent or Claire McCaskill will.  The vote for stem cell research could change lives.  

So what&#039;s it going to be Missouri?  Are you satisfied to watch a bunch of washed-up celebrities prance around while the people who really effect your life are being decided?  

Your choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a very disturbing story.<br />
Of course we all know who is to blame&#8230;</p>
<p>Us.</p>
<p>We ignore politics, we vote for who we think looks the best instead of who is best qualified, and we can&#8217;t stop being infatuated by media-generated celebrities.  I have no idea who Sara Evans is, but that didn&#8217;t stop the media from spending the last 3 days talking about her!</p>
<p>WE the people need to demand more not just from the news media and our politicians, but from OURSELVES.  We all need to find the time to understand the issues, and then get off our lazy butts and VOTE.  If not, we end up where we are now &#8211; in a terribly bloody, expensive war run by a President that was/is never questioned by the Congress.</p>
<p>The next episode of &#8220;Survivor&#8221; or &#8220;Gray&#8217;s Anatomy&#8221; isn&#8217;t going to change your life &#8211; however, the election of Jim Talent or Claire McCaskill will.  The vote for stem cell research could change lives.  </p>
<p>So what&#8217;s it going to be Missouri?  Are you satisfied to watch a bunch of washed-up celebrities prance around while the people who really effect your life are being decided?  </p>
<p>Your choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pendergasted</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71767</link>
		<dc:creator>pendergasted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2006/10/debate-tonight-what-debate/#comment-71767</guid>
		<description>Dissappointed, yes. Surprising, no.  After all, this is the same televison station that would rather air sitcom reruns than Nightline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dissappointed, yes. Surprising, no.  After all, this is the same televison station that would rather air sitcom reruns than Nightline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

