<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TIF Audit, Part Deux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/</link>
	<description>A Weblog for Kansas City, Missouri.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smenibypedind</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-189812</link>
		<dc:creator>Smenibypedind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/#comment-189812</guid>
		<description>Two new studies show why some people are more attractive for members of the opposite sex than others. 
 
The University of Florida, Florida State University found that physically attractive people almost instantly attract the attention of the interlocutor, sobesednitsy with them, literally, it is difficult to make eye. This conclusion was reached by a series of psychological experiments, which were determined by the people who believe in sending the first seconds after the acquaintance. Here, a curious feature: single, unmarried experimental preferred to look at the guys, beauty opposite sex, and family, people most often by representatives of their sex. 
 
The authors believe that this feature developed a behavior as a result of the evolution: a man trying to find a decent pair to acquire offspring. If this is resolved, he wondered potential rivals. Detailed information about this magazine will be published Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 
 
In turn, a joint study of the Rockefeller University, Rockefeller University and Duke University, Duke University in North Carolina revealed that women are perceived differently by men smell. During experiments studied the perception of women one of the ingredients of male pheromone-androstenona smell, which is contained in urine or sweat. 
 
The results were startling: women are part of this repugnant odor, and the other part is very attractive, resembling the smell of vanilla, and the third group have not felt any smell. The authors argue that the reason is that the differences in the receptor responsible for the olfactory system, from different people are different. 
 
It has long been proven that mammals (including human) odor is one way of attracting the attention of representatives of the opposite sex. A detailed article about the journal Nature will publish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two new studies show why some people are more attractive for members of the opposite sex than others. </p>
<p>The University of Florida, Florida State University found that physically attractive people almost instantly attract the attention of the interlocutor, sobesednitsy with them, literally, it is difficult to make eye. This conclusion was reached by a series of psychological experiments, which were determined by the people who believe in sending the first seconds after the acquaintance. Here, a curious feature: single, unmarried experimental preferred to look at the guys, beauty opposite sex, and family, people most often by representatives of their sex. </p>
<p>The authors believe that this feature developed a behavior as a result of the evolution: a man trying to find a decent pair to acquire offspring. If this is resolved, he wondered potential rivals. Detailed information about this magazine will be published Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. </p>
<p>In turn, a joint study of the Rockefeller University, Rockefeller University and Duke University, Duke University in North Carolina revealed that women are perceived differently by men smell. During experiments studied the perception of women one of the ingredients of male pheromone-androstenona smell, which is contained in urine or sweat. </p>
<p>The results were startling: women are part of this repugnant odor, and the other part is very attractive, resembling the smell of vanilla, and the third group have not felt any smell. The authors argue that the reason is that the differences in the receptor responsible for the olfactory system, from different people are different. </p>
<p>It has long been proven that mammals (including human) odor is one way of attracting the attention of representatives of the opposite sex. A detailed article about the journal Nature will publish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: politipal</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-164766</link>
		<dc:creator>politipal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/#comment-164766</guid>
		<description>But which candidate said this:

General Plan

I will initiate a comprehensive development plan for Kansas City. Many agencies and groups have development plans for parts of the city, but we lack a consolidated comprehensive plan. This plan will map out redevelopment and new development so that growth is managed in a way that allows city to maintain a high level of service to its residents. A general plan also will help ensure neighborhood priorities are met before those of developers. The city’s too often ignored FOCUS plans can provide the starting point for the general plan.

Tax Incentive Reforms

Tax incentives are important economic development tools, but they have not always been used properly. The city needs to stop chasing after developers’ projects and use tax incentives to promote our own priorities. It is now time for us to target future incentives toward areas that have not shared in the current boom and to finish some projects that have languished.

1.	Tax Incentive Use Policy – My administration will develop a written policy that the TIF Commission and city must follow when awarding tax incentives for development. The tax incentive use policy will ensure that city incentives fit within the general plan, are only used on projects that remedy blight or fulfill a specific economic need of the city, and, when appropriate, are leveraged with federal and state tax incentives. It will be developed with citywide input and require that all projects be independently reviewed before they can receive financing. An independent review will ensure that tax incentives, including TIF, follow that policy and are only used on projects that remedy blight or fulfill a specific economic need of the city.

2.	Super Majority to Override TIF Commission – It is too easy for the city council to ignore the recommendations of the TIF Commission. If the TIF Commission does not recommend a project for incentives, it only takes a simple majority of the council to override their recommendation.  As mayor, I will appoint members to the TIF Commission who will use incentives for neighborhood priorities, and I will call for a charter amendment that requires a city council vote of 2/3 to override a TIF Commission recommendation to deny incentives to a development plan.

3.	Small Business – Small businesses and those committed to their current location in K.C. are too often left out of the tax incentive equation.  They have provided a steady tax base to our city for decades and they should be included in any discussion of economic development. To assist them, I will: (1) maintain city infrastructure in and around these businesses; (2) ensure transit access to business/commercial centers; and (3) cooperate with CIDs – groups of businesses that are committing their own funds, usually bearing more than 50% of project costs – to fund improvements in commercial districts.  I will also make city hall friendly to businesses that are struggling to invest in their physical plant and employees. As mayor, I will declare war on red tape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But which candidate said this:</p>
<p>General Plan</p>
<p>I will initiate a comprehensive development plan for Kansas City. Many agencies and groups have development plans for parts of the city, but we lack a consolidated comprehensive plan. This plan will map out redevelopment and new development so that growth is managed in a way that allows city to maintain a high level of service to its residents. A general plan also will help ensure neighborhood priorities are met before those of developers. The city’s too often ignored FOCUS plans can provide the starting point for the general plan.</p>
<p>Tax Incentive Reforms</p>
<p>Tax incentives are important economic development tools, but they have not always been used properly. The city needs to stop chasing after developers’ projects and use tax incentives to promote our own priorities. It is now time for us to target future incentives toward areas that have not shared in the current boom and to finish some projects that have languished.</p>
<p>1.	Tax Incentive Use Policy – My administration will develop a written policy that the TIF Commission and city must follow when awarding tax incentives for development. The tax incentive use policy will ensure that city incentives fit within the general plan, are only used on projects that remedy blight or fulfill a specific economic need of the city, and, when appropriate, are leveraged with federal and state tax incentives. It will be developed with citywide input and require that all projects be independently reviewed before they can receive financing. An independent review will ensure that tax incentives, including TIF, follow that policy and are only used on projects that remedy blight or fulfill a specific economic need of the city.</p>
<p>2.	Super Majority to Override TIF Commission – It is too easy for the city council to ignore the recommendations of the TIF Commission. If the TIF Commission does not recommend a project for incentives, it only takes a simple majority of the council to override their recommendation.  As mayor, I will appoint members to the TIF Commission who will use incentives for neighborhood priorities, and I will call for a charter amendment that requires a city council vote of 2/3 to override a TIF Commission recommendation to deny incentives to a development plan.</p>
<p>3.	Small Business – Small businesses and those committed to their current location in K.C. are too often left out of the tax incentive equation.  They have provided a steady tax base to our city for decades and they should be included in any discussion of economic development. To assist them, I will: (1) maintain city infrastructure in and around these businesses; (2) ensure transit access to business/commercial centers; and (3) cooperate with CIDs – groups of businesses that are committing their own funds, usually bearing more than 50% of project costs – to fund improvements in commercial districts.  I will also make city hall friendly to businesses that are struggling to invest in their physical plant and employees. As mayor, I will declare war on red tape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry T</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-164575</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/#comment-164575</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know will have to form a fact finding committee and get back with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know will have to form a fact finding committee and get back with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-164546</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/archives/2007/04/tif-audit-part-deux/#comment-164546</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many of my tax dollars went to fund a consultant to say exactly what our internal auditor had been saying for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many of my tax dollars went to fund a consultant to say exactly what our internal auditor had been saying for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

