<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogosphere does not equal Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/</link>
	<description>A Weblog for Kansas City, Missouri.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benja</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-191772</link>
		<dc:creator>Benja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/?p=1664#comment-191772</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many copyright owners KCTalk currently infringes on?

Viacom?
NBC?
Fox?
WWE?
CNN?
Associated Press?

I mean KCTalk has tons of copyrighted photos and trademarked logos all over the site without exclusive written permission of the IP owners of these respected parties. Not to mention the fact that KCTalk.com not even being a registered legally entity cannot legally make &quot;fair use&quot; under federal law.

Response?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many copyright owners KCTalk currently infringes on?</p>
<p>Viacom?<br />
NBC?<br />
Fox?<br />
WWE?<br />
CNN?<br />
Associated Press?</p>
<p>I mean KCTalk has tons of copyrighted photos and trademarked logos all over the site without exclusive written permission of the IP owners of these respected parties. Not to mention the fact that KCTalk.com not even being a registered legally entity cannot legally make &#8220;fair use&#8221; under federal law.</p>
<p>Response?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Shaw, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-191771</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Shaw, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/?p=1664#comment-191771</guid>
		<description>@MadDawg - Actually if you checked your server logs and Im sure if BlogKC were to do the same you would see that I am in fact visiting both KCTalk and BlogKC from our firms LAN.

I do represent the banned member you speak of and you fail to mention that KCTalk&#039;s founder just as of last night removed all content which was copyright of my client in order for litigation to end.

You fail to realize though that 50% of the material on KCTalk.com is unlicensed copyrighted material in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MadDawg &#8211; Actually if you checked your server logs and Im sure if BlogKC were to do the same you would see that I am in fact visiting both KCTalk and BlogKC from our firms LAN.</p>
<p>I do represent the banned member you speak of and you fail to mention that KCTalk&#8217;s founder just as of last night removed all content which was copyright of my client in order for litigation to end.</p>
<p>You fail to realize though that 50% of the material on KCTalk.com is unlicensed copyrighted material in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadDawg</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-191770</link>
		<dc:creator>MadDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/?p=1664#comment-191770</guid>
		<description>The above is untrue. It was posted by a banned member of KCTalk, not a real attorney. I&#039;m sure the folks at &#039;Pillsbury Law Firm&#039; have more professionalism than that. In fact, I may just ask them about it...They likely wouldn&#039;t like their names being used in false statements.

As to whether KCTalk is a blog or not, it&#039;s not a blog. One thing that always aggravates me is seeing KCTalk being called a blog. It&#039;s not a blog! There is a distinct difference in blogs and forums.

Blogs (web logs) are more like diaries (logs). Blogs are single posts/blurbs made and maintained by an individual or small group of individuals. Whereas a forum (discussion board) is a collection of threaded discussions maintained by many people. There is a difference.

KCTalk is for old people? If you mean older than 17, sure....We have a wide range of ages, young and old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above is untrue. It was posted by a banned member of KCTalk, not a real attorney. I&#8217;m sure the folks at &#8216;Pillsbury Law Firm&#8217; have more professionalism than that. In fact, I may just ask them about it&#8230;They likely wouldn&#8217;t like their names being used in false statements.</p>
<p>As to whether KCTalk is a blog or not, it&#8217;s not a blog. One thing that always aggravates me is seeing KCTalk being called a blog. It&#8217;s not a blog! There is a distinct difference in blogs and forums.</p>
<p>Blogs (web logs) are more like diaries (logs). Blogs are single posts/blurbs made and maintained by an individual or small group of individuals. Whereas a forum (discussion board) is a collection of threaded discussions maintained by many people. There is a difference.</p>
<p>KCTalk is for old people? If you mean older than 17, sure&#8230;.We have a wide range of ages, young and old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Shaw of Pillsbury Law Firm</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-191769</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Shaw of Pillsbury Law Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/?p=1664#comment-191769</guid>
		<description>KCTalk.com is also currently under litigation for violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. 

I am personally handling this case out of our firm&#039;s San Francisco Office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KCTalk.com is also currently under litigation for violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. </p>
<p>I am personally handling this case out of our firm&#8217;s San Francisco Office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-191675</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 03:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/?p=1664#comment-191675</guid>
		<description>The distinction between a blog and a discussion board is a trivial one, and I think as the &#039;net matures it will eventually not exist at all. The only difference is that at a &quot;blog&quot; there is an editor or a team of editors responsible for deciding which content makes the cut and which doesn&#039;t, then discussion proceeds under &quot;comments&quot;. Say, like what is happening here. In a discussion board, the membership itself decides which content makes the cut by virtue of continually responding to it and keeping it &quot;bumped&quot; or at the top of the page.

The similarities are greater than the differences, and I imagine that it won&#039;t be long before the two concepts merge. They already have, sort of (see digg.com and others) but none of what we&#039;ve seen so far are a full realization of the hybrid model. It won&#039;t be long, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distinction between a blog and a discussion board is a trivial one, and I think as the &#8216;net matures it will eventually not exist at all. The only difference is that at a &#8220;blog&#8221; there is an editor or a team of editors responsible for deciding which content makes the cut and which doesn&#8217;t, then discussion proceeds under &#8220;comments&#8221;. Say, like what is happening here. In a discussion board, the membership itself decides which content makes the cut by virtue of continually responding to it and keeping it &#8220;bumped&#8221; or at the top of the page.</p>
<p>The similarities are greater than the differences, and I imagine that it won&#8217;t be long before the two concepts merge. They already have, sort of (see digg.com and others) but none of what we&#8217;ve seen so far are a full realization of the hybrid model. It won&#8217;t be long, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr. matt</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-191672</link>
		<dc:creator>mr. matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/?p=1664#comment-191672</guid>
		<description>&quot;knock knock&quot;

&quot;who is there?&quot;

&quot;who cares!!!!!!!!!!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;knock knock&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;who is there?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;who cares!!!!!!!!!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob berdella</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-191669</link>
		<dc:creator>bob berdella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/?p=1664#comment-191669</guid>
		<description>KCtalk.com is for old people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KCtalk.com is for old people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-191667</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/?p=1664#comment-191667</guid>
		<description>I agree that there is a distinction but I&#039;ve always wondered what it is . . . KC Talk has an RSS feed just like a blog but their content isn&#039;t organized in a &quot;most recent to oldest&quot; format which is typical on most blogs. The site is written by multiple authors but so are many blogs. KC Talk is mostly discussion but it&#039;s also true of the best blogs that the discussions are the most exciting part of the content. Is it simply a case of the software that they are using? Finally, most of the new case law and decisions that protect Internet speech apply across the board from discussion boards to webpages like Drudge to blogs. I&#039;m just wondering: What is it about a blog that makes it a blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there is a distinction but I&#8217;ve always wondered what it is . . . KC Talk has an RSS feed just like a blog but their content isn&#8217;t organized in a &#8220;most recent to oldest&#8221; format which is typical on most blogs. The site is written by multiple authors but so are many blogs. KC Talk is mostly discussion but it&#8217;s also true of the best blogs that the discussions are the most exciting part of the content. Is it simply a case of the software that they are using? Finally, most of the new case law and decisions that protect Internet speech apply across the board from discussion boards to webpages like Drudge to blogs. I&#8217;m just wondering: What is it about a blog that makes it a blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JL</title>
		<link>http://blogkc.com/archives/2008/05/blogosphere-does-not-equal-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-191665</link>
		<dc:creator>JL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogkc.com/?p=1664#comment-191665</guid>
		<description>Good point.  I will correct it.  I&#039;m old.  Cut me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  I will correct it.  I&#8217;m old.  Cut me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

