Dec
19
St. Louis pushing for local control of police, where’s KC?
December 19, 2009 | 2 Comments
Kansas City and St. Louis are unique among American cities in that their police departments are controlled by the state, and not the local city government. The two departments are controlled police boards appointed by the governor. This often leads to concerns about the departments’ responsiveness to local needs like community policing, gang prevention, traffic enforcement, etc. Just this year, the KCPD has clashed with the City Council over budgets, consolidation of back office services, and participation in the regional jail project.
While community members and leaders in both cities often talk about the desire for local control, the difference is that St. Louis actually does something about. For the third year in a row, St. Louis’ state legislators are introducing bills to transfer the police department to the City of St. Louis. It sounds like this year they might have a chance.
So where are Kansas City leaders in this discussion? It would be so much easier for the two cities to join forces (and votes) to address a common concern. Is Kansas City missing its best opportunity to take control of the police department?
Categories: City Council, Crime, Missouri, Politics, kcpd.

Contact and Tips
Why would we want that? Do you really want the same group that gave the city manager a big raise before firing him when they got over their hurt feelings a few months later to have responsibility over our safety? Do you really want our police protection centered on wealthy developers, the way our economic policy is?
The police department is the best-functioning agency in the city or county government. Let’s not “fix” it.
It is definitely a point of controversy here in St. Louis. I don’t think the cops on the beat support the city taking control of the Metropolitan Police Dept., what with the record of corruption on varying levels at St. Louis City Hall.